Folks: The new antenneX
online issue #147 for the month of July 2009 is ready to read at your pleasure!
IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow
me to introduce this month's line-up of content:
OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:
- Antenna
Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL
(A Posthumous Publication)
NEC Implementations:
Cores, Limitations and Work-Arounds
In this series of columns, we have examined the NEC-2 and NEC-4
programs, with some attention to MININEC, in order to master to some degree
the geometry and control commands and to assure that our models are as
adequate to various modeling tasks as we can make them. We have not used
various programs to recommend the particular implementations of NEC, but
only to illustrate how we may reach or approximate (in some cases) a point
where the core will calculate usable results. However, we have not
undertaken in any systematic way an account of some of the differences among
implementations of the cores. We shall turn our attention to this subject
from time to time. Our goal is not to review programs. Nor is it to make
recommendations. Instead, the aim is to note the various ways by which we
may achieve the same goals in modeling using different means.
-
From the Shack
By Robert C. Wilson, AL7KK
The Hunt for the Universal Antenna
The dream of many radio engineers and radio aficionados is to have just one
antenna that will take care of all reception and transmission problems. The
name for this universal antenna is in many cases ‘a broadband antenna’.
Under ideal circumstances this antenna would be efficient, cover every
frequency of interest to the person, be compact, have adequate gain, and
interface perfectly with his or her equipment at a desirable impedance.
After having been advanced planner for the Voice of America and involved in
engineering for the last 60 years I think I have heard most of the stories.
A number of universal antenna systems have been designed and published. Some
work within limits, some just don’t work well, and some have interesting
problems that are invisible to the person without long experience in this
specialized field. This paper will give an overview by listing, briefly, the
classifications and names of the most popular common broadband antennas. I
will show a drawing of the antenna, indicate broadly the frequency bands
with low SWR to be expected. Note that SWR stands for Standing Wave Ratio,
or the ability of the antenna to match the receiver or transmitter to which
it may be attached. Also note I will not include multi-band antennas since
they do not fit the category of wide band antennas.
-
Ham WorkShop
By Augie "Gus" Hansen, KB0YH
A Versatile Boom-to-Mast Clamp
Over a period of nearly five decades involved with broadcasting,
commercial measurement and communications, and ham radio I have spent a lot
of time hanging off the side of all manner of towers. In all of the work
done, a main consideration has been the use of stable attachments for
equipment and antennas.
Often times the desired attachment stability comes at the cost of
convenience. For example, many commercial and ham radio antennas are
provided with a single-plate boom-to-mast clamp that is a real pain to deal
with even on a calm day at ground level. On a cold, windy day at fifty to a
hundred feet or more up a tower, any complications are greatly magnified.
The simplest way to minimize problems with antenna attachments is to use a
two-part mounting scheme. This article explains.
- Stone's Throw!
By Jack L. Stone, Publisher
When the Hen Cackles!
A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products,
people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its
authorsalthough not limited to this only.
FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY
OF NEW ISSUES:
|
Six-Meter Quad Antennas
By Augie "Gus" Hansen, KB0YH |
|
In
a previous article (“Starter Antennas for Six Meters”, antenneX,
June 2009) I described several antennas that could help those with
six-meter capable radios to get on the band quickly for a trial run
during the peak skip season. Many of us have at one time or another
dipped a toe in the water and have become fully immersed the six
meter pool. Others, hearing nothing, have beaten a hasty retreat.
That’s their loss.
As noted in the article, when the band opens it can produce some
great DX. Well, it has been open very often this past June 2009. The
band will continue to be open during much of July, and can provide
less frequent but excellent openings any time of year.
The next step for the committed six-meter convert is to install a
gain antenna to help out with the weak ones and to provide a way to
combat QRM and QRN. This article describes the evolution of a simple
quad loop into a four element cubical quad that provides good gain
and a reasonable front-to-rear ratio. For this article I have
limited the antenna to six meters, but in an earlier incarnation the
antenna had a five-element two-meter cubical quad interleaved on the
same boom, with all but one element sharing the existing six-meter
element frames. The two-meter driver loop had its own small frame
and a separate feedline. |
|
Practical Antennas: Part 1.1
By
Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU |
|
The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important
role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do
about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and
efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna
itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching
properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line.
It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or
tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio
electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of
light.
How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate
electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the
answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and
some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas
and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is
not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and
hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts
even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I
often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and
characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple
antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The
dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the
dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will
be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more
complicated antennas.
The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals
mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole
is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a
Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the
dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving
antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be
fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many
other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the
antenna story develops. |
|
NewcomerNotes: Yagis and Loops and
Quads, Oh My!
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q |
|
As I write this, barely a week
has gone by since the June 2009 VHF contest and I am already excited
about the next one coming in July. Why am I so excited? Well, I made
my first 6-meter contacts ever, and I did it with an antenna that is
hardly optimum for the band. The best I had been able to do
previously was raise a local repeater, but no one was ever listening
when I put out a call. Knowing there would be people specifically
hunting 6-meter contacts during the contest, I spent most of my
radio time over the weekend checking up and down the dial hoping to
hear some people calling CQ. Fortunately, I was not disappointed. |
|
Radio Mobile
By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU |
|
Antenna design is a fascinating
subject, and many simulation programs are available. These enable
new ideas to be tested out on the computer before actually building
a prototype. One thing that has been missing is the ability to
simulate a designed antenna for its signal path performance over
real terrain. This simulation can now be achieved by using the
‘Radio Mobile’ program.
Radio Mobile is a free propagation simulation program written by
Roger Coudé, VE2DBE (2). It is based on the Longley Rice Irregular
Terrain Model which is useful over the frequency range of 20MHz to
20GHz. Elevation data from the Space Shuttle Radar Terrain Mapping
Mission, (SRTM), is downloaded from the USGS site to generate
elevation maps of any area, and road maps and aerial photographs can
be downloaded and merged as required. Radio Units can be specified
for performance and placed where needed on the map, and the
characteristics of any Radio Link between any pair of Units
examined, complete with a path ground profile. |
|
VHF Scattering by Rotating Wind
Turbines:
Backyard Observations
By Bruce L. Cragin, K1THC |
|
Useful observations of the scattering of VHF or UHF radio waves by
rotating wind turbines can be made using simple equipment typical of
that used by radio amateurs or even scanner enthusiasts. Results
obtained here, which are typical of what can be accomplished,
confirm and shed light on recently reported features of the time
variation of the scattered wave intensity.
Strictly speaking, these are not so much backyard observations as
front-porch ones. Eight of the twelve new Gamesa Eolica G87-2.0MW
wind turbines that make up New Hampshire’s first commercial wind
farm are visible from the front porch of the boyhood home to which I
returned earlier this year. Thus, when the topic of
VHF/UHF/microwave scattering by wind turbines arose recently on the
antenneX discussion list, I was well positioned to undertake
some relevant measurements as described in this paper. |
|
Triple Folded Dipole Feed for Yagi
Antennas
By Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW (Serbia) |
In an
article by G0KSC, he published his ‘Revolutionary Loop Feed Array
Yagi Antenna Feed System’. Reading this article I concluded that the
idea is good but that it would be possible to get much better
results with even further modified Yagi antenna feeding system.
It is known that for the best cancellation of antenna rear lobes in
order to get as clean pattern as possible it is necessary to
separately and precisely tune currents amplitude and phase in
passive elements which are immediate to driver, i.e. reflector and
first director. This would be possible by optimum tuning of coupling
by varying distance and phasing by varying length of driven element
almost independently for each nearest passive element reflector and
first director. Optimum coupling and phasing can be done only if
driven element is mechanically designed in such way that enables
almost independently and simultaneously tuning for best distance and
length according to demands on both nearest passive elements. Triple
Folded Dipole Feed (3FDF) System, situated in the plane of an
antenna, gives this opportunity. |
|
|
For paid subscriber
access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html
...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.
Non-subscriber access, go to the
Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html
For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue.
It's in your best interest to know these things.
To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm
For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html
Join the Mail List
& Discussion Forum
Do
you have a question?
Hope you enjoy the new issue!
Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com
~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components | |